Listen to internet radio with theliteraryunderground on Blog Talk Radio
Showing posts with label project u. Show all posts
Showing posts with label project u. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Project U Radio. June 7, 2012
Listen to internet radio with theliteraryunderground on Blog Talk Radio
June/July 2012 On Project U Radio
The Literary Underground also features Your Mother's Medicine Cabinet (Frank Reardon), The Drakonian Vampire Tunnel, and Meth Lab (Frankie Metro). Download previous episodes or listen online if you miss them! Read more for the schedule...
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Spontaneous Poetry, Session 1
Spontaneous Poetry @ Project U Radio. Join us on Thursday, March 22 at 11:30 EST, 8:30 Pacific. (LINK TO EPISODE PAGE) Wanna play? All you have to do is get a notebook, any kind. Doesn't matter. You need a place to leave it where people can be free to add their spontaneous poetry without it disappearing because if it does, well, then you have spontaneous but LOST poetry. You can write in it yourself. You can pass it around. You can transcribe things that you hear, you can capture a conversation. Then call in to our show and read it or send it through email as text to be read or as an mp3 of the text being read by you. Or anyone, really. Doesn't matter. Identity isn't important. What matters is that you seek out words, preferably words rooted in the moment. Spontaneous. Then share your findings. It can be a phone message, rant, rap lyrics. Easy? Good. (805) 856-2808. You can also just call up, read, talk, that's good too. Always welcome.
Following week, we will get to the topic of Bukowski, like we were going to but then people crabbed about him which is all the more reason to do it, no? Buk Boxing. Love him, hate him, feel irritated by poets that compare themselves to him? Think his iconic role is deserved? Want to reflect on the man, his words, or why you care so much about arguing? Call us up. The myths, the man, the cult of Buk.
Monday, January 2, 2012
January 6th, Project U Radio @ The Literary Underground
Hosted by Frankie Metro, Lynn Alexander, and Paul Corman-Roberts.
You can call in or send a comment to be read if you want to chime in anonymously. You can also leave a comment here with your name if you can't call in. All welcome, uncensored, unscripted, unhinged.
Monday, December 12, 2011
January 20, 2012, Segment 5, Project U Radio
Segment 5: January 20, 2012. ”Editorial Discretion”. Editors, would you publish work with content that you think is personally objectionable (i.e. racism) if you thought it was an otherwise good piece? How do you feel about a blanket policy about certain kinds of content, such as “We don’t publish anything that includes sexist elements”. Do you make distinctions as far as language, character, etc. and have you had this issue come up when selecting work for a zine, website, journal, or project? Do you find the line of subjective interpretation to be difficult? Have you rejected work that you thought was well written because it contained something that you thought to be offensive or thought might offend readers? Beyond offensive, but perhaps hurtful or harmful?
If you want to start at the beginning, check out the archives *here* for our Censorship show, December 2, 2011, where we discussed movements like The Citizens For Decent Literature whose aim was to suppress literature that organizers felt was "objectionable". Inspired by this and being a fan of free speech, Literary Underground's Michele McDannold started a printed publication by the same name and soon after, a website to showcase poetry online. Brief editor of the website content, Michael Goscinski, was invited on to talk about censorship and a lengthy conversation ensued.
My distinction on the difference between censorship and editorial discretion is simple- one involves the systemic suppression of free speech through an authority either by their own undertaking or under pressure by a group that has lobbied for suppression. The other involves the discretion of a content producer and their right to have standards with respect to content. If I have a magazine, I have the right to decide that I don't want any content that involves clowns. (to use my example from the show) We are looking at my right as an owner and producer to discretion, which I believe to be important. But censorship would involve the government telling producers that they cannot publish content that involves clowns. This distinction takes away editorial discretion with a blanket rule across the board, presumably (they say) for societal or other benefit. This is an external, imposed control meant to assert one group's moral or religious view onto another group by limiting clown content. ......
If you want to start at the beginning, check out the archives *here* for our Censorship show, December 2, 2011, where we discussed movements like The Citizens For Decent Literature whose aim was to suppress literature that organizers felt was "objectionable". Inspired by this and being a fan of free speech, Literary Underground's Michele McDannold started a printed publication by the same name and soon after, a website to showcase poetry online. Brief editor of the website content, Michael Goscinski, was invited on to talk about censorship and a lengthy conversation ensued.
My distinction on the difference between censorship and editorial discretion is simple- one involves the systemic suppression of free speech through an authority either by their own undertaking or under pressure by a group that has lobbied for suppression. The other involves the discretion of a content producer and their right to have standards with respect to content. If I have a magazine, I have the right to decide that I don't want any content that involves clowns. (to use my example from the show) We are looking at my right as an owner and producer to discretion, which I believe to be important. But censorship would involve the government telling producers that they cannot publish content that involves clowns. This distinction takes away editorial discretion with a blanket rule across the board, presumably (they say) for societal or other benefit. This is an external, imposed control meant to assert one group's moral or religious view onto another group by limiting clown content. ......
Labels:
BlogTalk,
censorship,
citizens for decent literature,
discussion,
editing,
literary underground,
lynn alexander,
michael gozcinski,
michele mcdannold,
paul corman-roberts,
poetry,
project u,
Project U Radio: Segments,
publishing,
racism,
radio,
small press,
topics
Friday, November 4, 2011
Project U Radio: Voices From The Literary Underground
Join hosts Lynn Alexander and Paul Corman-Roberts (Red Fez, Full Of Crow) for guests, callers and discussion about independent press topics, issues, and activism. All are welcome to call in, speak up, and be heard. For more information: theliteraryunderground.org. The Literary Underground is a community, and a growing resource for small press writers, publishers, and readers. The views expressed by guests and hosts are their own, and dissent is welcome. Uncensored, unscripted, and unhinged. Get in touch to get involved.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/theliteraryunderground
Call-in Number: (805) 856-2808
UPCOMING SHOWS:
Friday, November 18th 10pm-11pm CST(USA)
Friday, November 25th 10pm-11pm CST(USA)
Friday, December 2nd 10pm-11pm CST(USA)
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/theliteraryunderground
Call-in Number: (805) 856-2808
UPCOMING SHOWS:
Friday, November 18th 10pm-11pm CST(USA)
Friday, November 25th 10pm-11pm CST(USA)
Friday, December 2nd 10pm-11pm CST(USA)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)